Arthur C. Custance. · Rating details · 6 ratings · 1 review. Considered a classic in Christian apologetics, this scholarly analysis of the Biblical phrase ” without. Without Form and Void by Arthur C. Custance, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. “Without Form And Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis ” by – Arthur C. Custance – ISBN: , Classic Reprint Press.
|Published (Last):||12 April 2005|
|PDF File Size:||6.17 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.15 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Such a simile is employed in metallurgical literature because it aptly.
But Driver did admit in his. I believe, moreover, that there may be one further evidence in. Ian Sinke marked it as to-read Jul 11, Admittedly, this mode of interpretation is strange to us, but there.
Without Form and Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis 1:2
Only by reading these two papers can one assess which is the more scholarly. Yet he feels that there is. Caedmon him self or by those who took it upon themselves to modify.
In Volume 1 which covers the period from the Creation to Jacob, he has this excerpt on Genesis 1: There are a couple of claims that are often cited that do a lot of rhetorical work c.cistance critics of this view which, upon examination, are shown to be false. Dathe quite properly observes, the second might more sensibly have.
Rocholl who proposed some questions to him, and he replied to these questions by saying substantially what we have extracted above from his work. Rosenmuller in his Antiquissima. The force of abd was fully re.
Without Form and Void – Chapter 1
But our safest guide is perhaps Jeremiah’s vision of chaos-come-again, which is simply that of a darkened and devastated earth, from which life and order have fled. But there were some who, being aware of the “long-held view” which foorm have traced thus far, suddenly perceived that there really need be no conflict at all.
In Volume 1 which covers the period from the. But surely if we render Hayetha as “was”, we cannot but read this meaning into the text.
And if we once. Furthermore, in the Massoretic Text in which the Jewish scholars.
“Without Form And Void: A Study of the Meaning of Genesis ” by – Arthur C. Custance
Now the important point to notice next is that Delitzsch adopted. Admittedly, this mode of interpretation is strange to us, but there is really no doubt what is intended. It is perfectly ans that these epics and legends are full of fantasy and absurdity if read at their face value – but it is not absolutely certain that the writers themselves intended them to be taken precisely at face value.
The types buried in the rocks But as Dathe quite properly observes, the second might more sensibly have been rendered ” The usual view is that when geologists “proved” the earth to.
Rabbi Yehoshua, both of whom lived towards the end of the first and. Thayer says of its use in I Pet. The preterite, with the subject prefixed is the usual way of introducing a subsequent history and so the beginning of it. Todd marked it as to-read Sep 26, Just how far back can one trace this now. And similar indications may well have existed in former years in much lower latitudes where early man could have come across them and pondered their meaning.
But if so, it follows that the. Some Pagan Traditions of a Like Catastrophe. Young suggests the translation, “God did not create it to be a desolation ie. And these are the generations of the destruction which is. And Pusey himself notes that Delitzsch, who in earlier editions had argued against his own view, “subsequently embraced it”. It is surprising that this ofrm unbroken thread of testimony to a view that is now widely held to be of recent origin sithout have been consistently ignored or unrecognized for so long.
At any rate, whatever use or abuse they may have made of. It is surprising that this almost unbroken thread of testimony to a.