Abortion and Infanticide [Michael Tooley] on *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This book has two main concerns. The first is to isolate the. text Michael Tooley’s recent book, Abortion and Infanticide Tooley advances his arguments for a liberal position with great so- phistication and in impressive. MICHAEL TOOLEY. Abortion and Infanticide’. This essay deals with the question of the morality of abortion and in- fanticide. The fundamental ethical objection.
Author: | Arashirisar Faekora |
Country: | Netherlands |
Language: | English (Spanish) |
Genre: | Travel |
Published (Last): | 4 June 2008 |
Pages: | 247 |
PDF File Size: | 12.64 Mb |
ePub File Size: | 19.69 Mb |
ISBN: | 523-8-73964-595-1 |
Downloads: | 79586 |
Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
Uploader: | Taura |
A Defence of the Doctrine of Doing and Allowing. Tooley argues that these alternative proposals are implausible. No keywords specified fix it.
A comment on Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide.
Is the argument valid? So he would deny 2 and 3. Paul Langham – – Southern Journal of Philosophy 17 4: A Comment on Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide. Is this argument valid?
Find it on Scholar. An organism has a right to life only if it possesses the concept of a self as a continuing subject of experiences and other mental states, and believes that it is itself such a continuing entity. We would still want incanticide say that I have a right to life even though I nifanticide not now desire to live. So our treatment of many animals may be morally indefensible; we may be murdering innocent persons. This is a moral question.
Abortion in Applied Ethics.
Tooley’s immodest proposal: Abortion and Infanticide.
Reply to Don Marquis’s “Reiman on Abortion”. If an organism potentially possesses P, then the organism has a right to life now.
Between Abortion and Infanticide.
Sign in Create an account. The rough idea here is just this: But is this claim plausible?
A comment on Tooley’s Abortion and Infanticide.
Science Logic and Mathematics. Michael Tooley University of Colorado, Boulder. An organism possesses a serious right to life only if it possesses the concept of a self as a continuing subject of experiences and other mental states, and believes that it is itself such a continuing entity.
This is a purely factual question. He denies that the fetus is a person. Jeff McMahan – – Utilitas 19 2: History of Western Philosophy. If This Is My Body …: Jeffrey Reiman – – Journal of Social Philosophy 29 2: Infanticide and the Liberal View on Abortion.
These situations suggest the following qualification: For example, suppose that I have been brainwashed or indoctrinated such that I do not desire to live. Lack of desire due to temporary psychological derangement.
The SCR specifies a necessary condition for personhood. Card – – Bioethics 14 4: Devine – – Philosophy 59 He holds that fetuses and infants fail to meet the Ad.
Tooley’s immodest proposal: Abortion and Infanticide.
Is satisfaction of the SCR a sufficient condition for personhood? Abortion and infanticide are therefore morally permissible unless there are some other objections to toolwy practices. Rests on two pillars: